As noted in an earlier article I’ve started re-reading Overcoming Organizational Defenses with the intent of seeing how to integrate Argyris’s approach with TOC.
Confirmation that my intuition may have taken me down a fruitful path comes from Chapter 1 “Puzzles”:
“The players in these studies also take for granted policies and practices that are contrary to their managerial stewardship. They bypass root causes. They equate being realistic with being simplistic. They make all these actions undiscussable. They thus wind up creating a world in which the bad is tied up with the good so that producing the latter guarantees the former. Finally all of this is done with the best of intentions”
Which also sounds like the sort of situation a CRT was designed to explore!





June 18th, 2003 at 14:02
Exactly!
The whole purpose of a CRT (Current Reality Tree)…
http://www.focusedperformance.com/articles/resistance2.html
… is to allow discussion about undiscussable root causes, by pointing to deep causes that are not equivalent to point to individual contributors but to flaws found in dilemmas perpetuated by erroneous assumptions in the system design and operation.
July 4th, 2003 at 14:20
Learning Organisations and Constraints – more
Set up a new section on my Wiki for the discussion and development of thoughts around the overlap betwen Chris Argyris’s work and Theory of Constraints.
Using a drawing tool plugin for the wiki software to aid visual thinking and noting…