<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Actionable Knowledge</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.synesthesia.co.uk/blog/archives/2003/12/02/actionable-knowledge/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.synesthesia.co.uk/blog/archives/2003/12/02/actionable-knowledge/</link>
	<description>Notes on stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 17:15:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mrG</title>
		<link>http://www.synesthesia.co.uk/blog/archives/2003/12/02/actionable-knowledge/comment-page-1/#comment-96</link>
		<dc:creator>mrG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.synesthesia.co.uk/blog/archives/2003/12/02/actionable-knowledge/#comment-96</guid>
		<description>The counter-proof I offer to your open channel problem is CB-Radio, a completely open channel that has been used for education and direct collaboration for years.  Even our local police, until very recently, did all their co-ordinating communications via an open eavetroughable channel.  So that&#039;s not problem.

I&#039;ve also participated in many highly successful Wikis, most notably the WikiPaedia that vastly surpassed the meagre success of the closed, cloistered and &quot;expert reviewed&quot; big-brother NuPaedia; these two are my best example of the immense power of open collaboration vs the cloister approach.  DMOZ is another: The search engine information flow shows that Yahoo may be richer, but all search engines are deriving content from DMOZ.

On your other point about not blogging the actions you do take, that is an excellent point.  I take actions because of blog content all the time, some of it directly work related (and often critical to work, having outlined issues I had overlooked or misunderstood) --- even if it is only as an ice-breaker or a topic of dinner-time conversation to get the kids engaged in some family interaction.  This morning, our local radio station morning hosts did a bit they called &quot;Best of the Web&quot; where their second leading site to talk about was Merriam-Webster&#039;s dictionary and I thought to myself, &quot;What will they do tomorrow?&quot; 

And then thought how their daily &quot;top content&quot; problem is instantly solved if only they knew about DayPop or Blogdex, and if they were only running their own commentable blog, or better still an IM client, or even if they had more than one general-delivery email for the entire station, I could have told them about it right then and there! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="cocomment-ext-rating" id="cocomment-rating-96"></span>The counter-proof I offer to your open channel problem is CB-Radio, a completely open channel that has been used for education and direct collaboration for years.  Even our local police, until very recently, did all their co-ordinating communications via an open eavetroughable channel.  So that&#8217;s not problem.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve also participated in many highly successful Wikis, most notably the WikiPaedia that vastly surpassed the meagre success of the closed, cloistered and &#8220;expert reviewed&#8221; big-brother NuPaedia; these two are my best example of the immense power of open collaboration vs the cloister approach.  DMOZ is another: The search engine information flow shows that Yahoo may be richer, but all search engines are deriving content from DMOZ.</p>
<p>On your other point about not blogging the actions you do take, that is an excellent point.  I take actions because of blog content all the time, some of it directly work related (and often critical to work, having outlined issues I had overlooked or misunderstood) &#8212; even if it is only as an ice-breaker or a topic of dinner-time conversation to get the kids engaged in some family interaction.  This morning, our local radio station morning hosts did a bit they called &#8220;Best of the Web&#8221; where their second leading site to talk about was Merriam-Webster&#8217;s dictionary and I thought to myself, &#8220;What will they do tomorrow?&#8221; </p>
<p>And then thought how their daily &#8220;top content&#8221; problem is instantly solved if only they knew about DayPop or Blogdex, and if they were only running their own commentable blog, or better still an IM client, or even if they had more than one general-delivery email for the entire station, I could have told them about it right then and there! <img src='http://www.synesthesia.co.uk/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ton Zijlstra</title>
		<link>http://www.synesthesia.co.uk/blog/archives/2003/12/02/actionable-knowledge/comment-page-1/#comment-97</link>
		<dc:creator>Ton Zijlstra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.synesthesia.co.uk/blog/archives/2003/12/02/actionable-knowledge/#comment-97</guid>
		<description>Hi Julian,

Thanks for joining the conversation. Your point about filtering what you blog is a good and a very valid one. And I am beginning to see more now of how I myself let blogging generated thoughts trickle through to my working and personal environment. 

My main point I think becomes somewhat clearer to me now as well: there is a lot going on in my blog that I would love to turn into action but that is discouraged or stonewalled in the environment I am in, i.e. my work. In some of those instances I&#039;m sure I could turn it into action with a few people who &#039;get it&#039;, and the most obvious ones are my fellow bloggers whom collectively came up with the stuff in the first place. So I am looking to turn some of those bloggers on some topics into colleagues for part of their and my time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="cocomment-ext-rating" id="cocomment-rating-97"></span>Hi Julian,</p>
<p>Thanks for joining the conversation. Your point about filtering what you blog is a good and a very valid one. And I am beginning to see more now of how I myself let blogging generated thoughts trickle through to my working and personal environment. </p>
<p>My main point I think becomes somewhat clearer to me now as well: there is a lot going on in my blog that I would love to turn into action but that is discouraged or stonewalled in the environment I am in, i.e. my work. In some of those instances I&#8217;m sure I could turn it into action with a few people who &#8216;get it&#8217;, and the most obvious ones are my fellow bloggers whom collectively came up with the stuff in the first place. So I am looking to turn some of those bloggers on some topics into colleagues for part of their and my time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julian Elve</title>
		<link>http://www.synesthesia.co.uk/blog/archives/2003/12/02/actionable-knowledge/comment-page-1/#comment-98</link>
		<dc:creator>Julian Elve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.synesthesia.co.uk/blog/archives/2003/12/02/actionable-knowledge/#comment-98</guid>
		<description>I think the issue with open-channel dialogue relates to the sort of problems one is seeking to build knowledge around. If it is knowledge of a &quot;how do I do that&quot; type then open-channel works well. If it&#039;s &quot;how to I deal with this person/entity&quot; then less so

I think open channel can also work well where you are the business entity (i.e. you are self-employed) - because at the end of the day it is entirely down to you. The issue I&#039;m conscious of and wrote about is when you work for a larger organisation - my instinct is that if I wrote openly about the sort of problems around which I need to generate knowledge I would find myself in water that was at least uncomfortably warm... I may be being over-cautious of course!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="cocomment-ext-rating" id="cocomment-rating-98"></span>I think the issue with open-channel dialogue relates to the sort of problems one is seeking to build knowledge around. If it is knowledge of a &#8220;how do I do that&#8221; type then open-channel works well. If it&#8217;s &#8220;how to I deal with this person/entity&#8221; then less so</p>
<p>I think open channel can also work well where you are the business entity (i.e. you are self-employed) &#8211; because at the end of the day it is entirely down to you. The issue I&#8217;m conscious of and wrote about is when you work for a larger organisation &#8211; my instinct is that if I wrote openly about the sort of problems around which I need to generate knowledge I would find myself in water that was at least uncomfortably warm&#8230; I may be being over-cautious of course!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julian Elve</title>
		<link>http://www.synesthesia.co.uk/blog/archives/2003/12/02/actionable-knowledge/comment-page-1/#comment-99</link>
		<dc:creator>Julian Elve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.synesthesia.co.uk/blog/archives/2003/12/02/actionable-knowledge/#comment-99</guid>
		<description>Ton - I see what you mean, and this I think is the nub of what Stuart Henshall is touching on (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.henshall.com/blog/archives/000627.html)&quot;&gt;http://www.henshall.com/blog/archives/000627.html)&lt;/a&gt; - if your interests lie in certain directions then why not move your source ofincome in those directions too!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="cocomment-ext-rating" id="cocomment-rating-99"></span>Ton &#8211; I see what you mean, and this I think is the nub of what Stuart Henshall is touching on (<a href="http://www.henshall.com/blog/archives/000627.html)"></a><a href="http://www.henshall.com/blog/archives/000627.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.henshall.com/blog/archives/000627.html</a>) &#8211; if your interests lie in certain directions then why not move your source ofincome in those directions too!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: judith</title>
		<link>http://www.synesthesia.co.uk/blog/archives/2003/12/02/actionable-knowledge/comment-page-1/#comment-100</link>
		<dc:creator>judith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.synesthesia.co.uk/blog/archives/2003/12/02/actionable-knowledge/#comment-100</guid>
		<description>julian...

i have been following lilia&#039;s &#039;loose ends&#039; conversation as well and you add an excellent conversation topic - a delicate tightrope we all walk, consciously or unconsciously - about how much we reveal about the questions and challenges we have in our daily lives. 

even as a business owner one must have a degree of sensitivity and awareness of one&#039;s languaging on this open network. 

that being said, it is refreshing when more general daily business problems and dilemmas are openly aired and shared. in the large fortune 100 companies that i have worked with - when there was an openess regarding the business challenges and questions there was always more room to invent and create effective solutions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="cocomment-ext-rating" id="cocomment-rating-100"></span>julian&#8230;</p>
<p>i have been following lilia&#8217;s &#8216;loose ends&#8217; conversation as well and you add an excellent conversation topic &#8211; a delicate tightrope we all walk, consciously or unconsciously &#8211; about how much we reveal about the questions and challenges we have in our daily lives. </p>
<p>even as a business owner one must have a degree of sensitivity and awareness of one&#8217;s languaging on this open network. </p>
<p>that being said, it is refreshing when more general daily business problems and dilemmas are openly aired and shared. in the large fortune 100 companies that i have worked with &#8211; when there was an openess regarding the business challenges and questions there was always more room to invent and create effective solutions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julian Elve</title>
		<link>http://www.synesthesia.co.uk/blog/archives/2003/12/02/actionable-knowledge/comment-page-1/#comment-101</link>
		<dc:creator>Julian Elve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.synesthesia.co.uk/blog/archives/2003/12/02/actionable-knowledge/#comment-101</guid>
		<description>Judith

Of course you are right - a climate of openness within an organisation about the challenges it faces  is essential to the successful mobilisation of the combined thought-power of all concerned to deal with those challenges. The place I work for is actually very good at that. My concern is more that if I were to write more openly about what we get up to, I would have to be careful to adopt &quot;the voice of the organisation&quot;. That isn&#039;t far from my natural voice (I wouldn&#039;t still be working there if it was) but it would nevertheless be a distortion in this personal space...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="cocomment-ext-rating" id="cocomment-rating-101"></span>Judith</p>
<p>Of course you are right &#8211; a climate of openness within an organisation about the challenges it faces  is essential to the successful mobilisation of the combined thought-power of all concerned to deal with those challenges. The place I work for is actually very good at that. My concern is more that if I were to write more openly about what we get up to, I would have to be careful to adopt &#8220;the voice of the organisation&#8221;. That isn&#8217;t far from my natural voice (I wouldn&#8217;t still be working there if it was) but it would nevertheless be a distortion in this personal space&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart Henshall</title>
		<link>http://www.synesthesia.co.uk/blog/archives/2003/12/02/actionable-knowledge/comment-page-1/#comment-102</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart Henshall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.synesthesia.co.uk/blog/archives/2003/12/02/actionable-knowledge/#comment-102</guid>
		<description>Julian, Your comment and perspective are really appreciated. You are not alone in your dance! I know you understand the value of open channels and their ability to eliminate rumor etc.  

Yet we still require places that allow &quot;free-wheeling&quot; and &quot;thinking out loud&quot;. &quot;Brainstorming Rooms&quot; may be better than personal blogs for such activities &quot;where unapproved risk&quot; is involved or the context later forgotten. Too strong a delineation between corporate and private destroys the capability to really bring others in.  We all understnad that this is a trade-off.    

Then we know blogs that are about &quot;blowing off steam&quot;.  Those personal aspects are probably not the best things to be blogging if you are interested in self - preservation internally or externally.    

However there is also a safer place someplace in the middle.  It&#039;s a &quot;collective&quot; sharing space where boundaries are more appropriately crossed.  Customer exchanges are examples.  

Plus there&#039;s advantages for enabling others to work on common problems.  Best Practices are one example.  This form of sharing may even go cross industry.  Perhaps blogging and wiki&#039;s can take that form of collaboration to an even higher level.  

Like with profiles degrees of access for blogs will likely develop.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="cocomment-ext-rating" id="cocomment-rating-102"></span>Julian, Your comment and perspective are really appreciated. You are not alone in your dance! I know you understand the value of open channels and their ability to eliminate rumor etc.  </p>
<p>Yet we still require places that allow &#8220;free-wheeling&#8221; and &#8220;thinking out loud&#8221;. &#8220;Brainstorming Rooms&#8221; may be better than personal blogs for such activities &#8220;where unapproved risk&#8221; is involved or the context later forgotten. Too strong a delineation between corporate and private destroys the capability to really bring others in.  We all understnad that this is a trade-off.    </p>
<p>Then we know blogs that are about &#8220;blowing off steam&#8221;.  Those personal aspects are probably not the best things to be blogging if you are interested in self &#8211; preservation internally or externally.    </p>
<p>However there is also a safer place someplace in the middle.  It&#8217;s a &#8220;collective&#8221; sharing space where boundaries are more appropriately crossed.  Customer exchanges are examples.  </p>
<p>Plus there&#8217;s advantages for enabling others to work on common problems.  Best Practices are one example.  This form of sharing may even go cross industry.  Perhaps blogging and wiki&#8217;s can take that form of collaboration to an even higher level.  </p>
<p>Like with profiles degrees of access for blogs will likely develop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julian Elve</title>
		<link>http://www.synesthesia.co.uk/blog/archives/2003/12/02/actionable-knowledge/comment-page-1/#comment-103</link>
		<dc:creator>Julian Elve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.synesthesia.co.uk/blog/archives/2003/12/02/actionable-knowledge/#comment-103</guid>
		<description>I think the &quot;safe places in the middle&quot; are exactly where it will grow. The blurring of corporate and private is (IMHO) where authenticity starts to show through...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="cocomment-ext-rating" id="cocomment-rating-103"></span>I think the &#8220;safe places in the middle&#8221; are exactly where it will grow. The blurring of corporate and private is (IMHO) where authenticity starts to show through&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marshall</title>
		<link>http://www.synesthesia.co.uk/blog/archives/2003/12/02/actionable-knowledge/comment-page-1/#comment-104</link>
		<dc:creator>Marshall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.synesthesia.co.uk/blog/archives/2003/12/02/actionable-knowledge/#comment-104</guid>
		<description>Regarding the word &quot;actionable&quot;. It is being used here with no understanding of its true meaning.
Please see &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hyperdictionary.com/dictionary/actionable&quot;&gt;http://www.hyperdictionary.com/dictionary/actionable&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="cocomment-ext-rating" id="cocomment-rating-104"></span>Regarding the word &#8220;actionable&#8221;. It is being used here with no understanding of its true meaning.<br />
Please see <a href="http://www.hyperdictionary.com/dictionary/actionable">http://www.hyperdictionary.com/dictionary/actionable</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julian Elve</title>
		<link>http://www.synesthesia.co.uk/blog/archives/2003/12/02/actionable-knowledge/comment-page-1/#comment-105</link>
		<dc:creator>Julian Elve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.synesthesia.co.uk/blog/archives/2003/12/02/actionable-knowledge/#comment-105</guid>
		<description>Marshall - yes you are right, the use of the word here, originally (at least within this &quot;conversation&quot;) coined by Ton, seems to mean &quot;knowledge that someone can directly use to influence their actions&quot;  - which as you say is different from the dictionary definition (the OED agrees with your source).

Time to find a thesaurus!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="cocomment-ext-rating" id="cocomment-rating-105"></span>Marshall &#8211; yes you are right, the use of the word here, originally (at least within this &#8220;conversation&#8221;) coined by Ton, seems to mean &#8220;knowledge that someone can directly use to influence their actions&#8221;  &#8211; which as you say is different from the dictionary definition (the OED agrees with your source).</p>
<p>Time to find a thesaurus!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

