<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Web 2.0 and Beyond: Social is Good for Business</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.synesthesia.co.uk/blog/archives/2008/03/05/web-20-and-beyond-social-is-good-for-business/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.synesthesia.co.uk/blog/archives/2008/03/05/web-20-and-beyond-social-is-good-for-business/</link>
	<description>Notes on stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 17:15:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil Burton - Web Spiders</title>
		<link>http://www.synesthesia.co.uk/blog/archives/2008/03/05/web-20-and-beyond-social-is-good-for-business/comment-page-1/#comment-221143</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil Burton - Web Spiders</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 14:19:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.synesthesia.co.uk/blog/archives/2008/03/05/web-20-and-beyond-social-is-good-for-business/#comment-221143</guid>
		<description>Julian, thanks for your brief blog on Snockles.  It is an interesting key thought you bring up.... 

We see Enterprise Snockles as a business social tool for use internally within a large organisation.

In this case is your social graph actually intellectual property of the company?  
would a company who gave you a tool want you to use the benefits of this when moving to another organisation (who could be a competitor)?  
all interesting points which I am sure the community could comment on. 

To be honest we are seeing a bigger interest in the &quot;white labelled&quot; version which attaches to your existing web site, can be rebranded and marketed to.  This I feel would maybe a more open community, which users who left the organisation could potentially still use ...

I&#039;m just thinking aloud here...

but I would be interested to hear your or other people further thoughts on Snockles.

Thanks again for the blog!

Best Regards
Neil B. 
 
P.s. the podcasts of Unicom&#039;s Social tools conference can be found at:
http://www.focusbiz.co.uk/conferences/web2.0/day1.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="cocomment-ext-rating" id="cocomment-rating-221143"></span>Julian, thanks for your brief blog on Snockles.  It is an interesting key thought you bring up&#8230;. </p>
<p>We see Enterprise Snockles as a business social tool for use internally within a large organisation.</p>
<p>In this case is your social graph actually intellectual property of the company?<br />
would a company who gave you a tool want you to use the benefits of this when moving to another organisation (who could be a competitor)?<br />
all interesting points which I am sure the community could comment on. </p>
<p>To be honest we are seeing a bigger interest in the &#8220;white labelled&#8221; version which attaches to your existing web site, can be rebranded and marketed to.  This I feel would maybe a more open community, which users who left the organisation could potentially still use &#8230;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m just thinking aloud here&#8230;</p>
<p>but I would be interested to hear your or other people further thoughts on Snockles.</p>
<p>Thanks again for the blog!</p>
<p>Best Regards<br />
Neil B. </p>
<p>P.s. the podcasts of Unicom&#8217;s Social tools conference can be found at:<br />
<a href="http://www.focusbiz.co.uk/conferences/web2.0/day1.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.focusbiz.co.uk/conferences/web2.0/day1.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

